@rmehta I notice that Dynamic Link fields in DocTypes that are Child Tables have no way to reference the Link field in the parent. I would expect the following to be possible in the definition of the Dynamic Link field:
Is there any reason for not having this? Is it okay to make a PR containing this?
Perhaps the issue is that since the parent is not named, there’s no guarantee that the column_1 field in parent.column_1 exists.
No specific reason, feel free to send a PR !
You might want to change the notation to parent.column_1 explicitly in this case.