November' 21 Roadmap

[Fred1]

In line with IFRS,for asset depreciation,we should make it possible for depreciation rate to change after asset revaluation.

[nasir]

Hey @harshit-30 ,
Great update! This definitely keeps the community in loop about the direction we are moving in.

With the 04 Dec 2021 mandatory E-invoicing regulation by Saudi Arabia’s ZATCA (tax authority), ERPNext accounting will become redundant if we don’t add this feature on Priority. December 4th is the last date. Lots of users from KSA are anguished, and few some shifted to others like Odoo(they implemented it) and other standalone solutions due to lack of feature from us. Umair had given an approx date of late Oct, but so far its not been merged.

We need to make sure ERPNext stays at the top of the game, and capture the market in Gulf.
80% work is already done by @Mohammad_Ahmad_Zulfi and @Mohammed_Redha, but has some bugs (e.g POS E-invoicing) & need extensive testing etc. Need someone dedicated supervise and merge it to the core.

Do let me know if there is anyway I can contribute and expedite the process.

GitHub - ahmadpak/ksa_vat: KSA VAT report build on Frappe framework for ERPNext

[matthkarl]

What is included in the Warehouse Management System? Will this be a Row - Shelf - Bin system?

[guimorin]

Great manufacturing features, I want them now

[glz]

Ability to edit Amount on Submitted Additional Salary

https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/issues/26740

[szufisher]

Frappe frame work

[New Feature Proposal] doc other than doctype wise default print format based on condition

I implemented this proposed feature in my own app for frappe/erpnext version 13. here I would like to know whether there is enough requirements from the community members. based on the feedback from community I will create pull request accordingly. thanks.

[New Feature Proposal] change from selection field to Autocomplete field for both role and doctype filtering field in permission manager

currently in permission manager screen, both role and doctype filtering fields are pure selection fields, which means user need to scroll among long list to select the role or doctype. it is not user friendly. it is proposed to change the field type from selection to Autocomplete, then user can both scroll from the long list like before and also possible to input search term to quickly locate to the target role and doctype. [image] How [image] [image] do you like this new feature to be …

Data import improvement

1. both export and import with translated column header
2. support both empty and same content parent row as same document
   
   
   
   ERPNext

[New Feature Proposal] Company wise Stock ageing exclude internal transfer stock entries

currently stock ageing report fetched all stock entries to calculate stock ageing, but for company wise stock ageing, internal stock transfers should be excluded.

[New Feature Proposal] Split production plan generated material request by default supplier, round up to min pack qty

production plan generated material request has following 2 issues all purchase related items in one material request, convert material request to following documents such as supplier quotation, purchase order etc need to be done manually one by one, normally by selecting the supplier even though there is safety stock and min purchase quantity, both it is same concept as min pack qty. solution highlight auto split material request by default supplier defined in item master 2.auto round up …

[New Feature Proposal] Enhance advance payment to purchase and sales order

this feature alone does not deserve a dedicated app, I will first publish the solution details here to get the feedback, as always if enough positive feedback, then I can try to start a new PR. Thanks.

respect user permission in accounting reports, especially accounts receivable

User can see restricted information (based on user permission) in reports

for your reference. create a new script report new_report copy accounts_receivable.js code to new_report.js, change the report name in js file in new_report.py , copy the below code import frappe from erpnext.accounts.report.accounts_receivable.accounts_receivable import ReceivablePayableReport def execute(filters=None): args = { "party_type": "Customer", "naming_by": ["Selling Settings", "cust_master_name"], } return MyReceivablePayableReport(filters).run(args) class MyReceivablePay…

[slavau]

@harshit-30

Just propose one.

Hello!

1. For chemical manufacturing concentration management is essential.
   All chemical active components have their concentration parameter specific for exact batch/lot. So, concentrations should present and be used for calculations in BOMs, in MRP, in ordering, in inventory arrivals, in manufacturing, etc.
   Even worse, there are several concentrations. a) Typical (for ordering), b) supplier MSDS (active component supplier guaranties “at least” concentration), and c) exact for specific batch (for manufacturing). Batches should be “breakable” when only part of the batch is used and the another part is returned to warehouse for later use.

2. Container management. When we order components, for example, from China/India/…, we need to track mixed containers with different components from different suppliers. How they composed, where is container right now, estimated arrival times for ports, custom releases, etc.

Is enough time by the end of November?

[kennethsequeira]

@slavau

1. For chemical manufacturing concentration management is essential.
   All chemical active components have their concentration parameter specific for exact batch/lot. So, concentrations should present and be used for calculations in BOMs, in MRP, in ordering, in inventory arrivals, in manufacturing, etc.

I would suggest creating a request and mapping out for process manufacturing end to end. That would increase the manufacturing base 4 fold.

[satisharalkar]

Thanks for the updating the Roadmap !
In Manufacturing Module, Inspection Required check is at header level. This is applying Quality required for all items including Scrap Items.

Inspection required should at Item level check box

Add One more option for Manufacture at Item level

If “Inspection Required in Manufacturing” is Yes then in Stock entry it should be applicable only for these items and not for all items.
for more information refer below link.

BOM Quality Inspection Required Rethink

I agree. Currently it is applicable to all items and scrap material. If the selection of Quality Inspection will be on item level, it will be helpful to remove quality inspection for scrap material.

Regards,
Satish Aralkar

[glz]

Checkout on ERPNext E-commerce using Mpesa Express

https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/issues/27687

[rioshaz]

i am willing to donate for the chat module development… pls share roadmap on the same…

[umair]

@bluesky

Looks great. Not sure what exactly will be included in the Assets module. If you work on the Assets Depreciation, it would be great if you could check the depreciation of existing, partially depreciated assets.

This use-case will be mostly covered. Fixes has been worked-upon as well. We are working-out the architecture and shall soon the same via Github Issue or other discuss post.

@Fred1

In line with IFRS,for asset depreciation,we should make it possible for depreciation rate to change after asset revaluation.

Can you please create a separate Github Issue for this feature request, with detailed specs and examples? If it already exist, may be just add a use-case to it.

@nasir

We need to make sure ERPNext stays at the top of the game, and capture the market in Gulf.
80% work is already done by @Mohammad_Ahmad_Zulfi and @Mohammed_Redha, but has some bugs (e.g POS E-invoicing) & need extensive testing etc. Need someone dedicated supervise and merge it to the core.

We shall soon plan with event to broadcast this feature with the community.

@matthkarl

What is included in the Warehouse Management System? Will this be a Row - Shelf - Bin system?

Most probably. For now, we should be taking this feature off the list and re-add once specs are clear. If you understand the gaps between WMS and ERPNext well, please share the same via another discuss post or Github Issue.

[njb]

The Front End/E Commerce feature has come a long way, very impressed. I think the one glaring thing missing is multiple payment options for check out.

Would be great to have a pre-order option on an item by item basis. Where a product could be ordered, but not charged until processed manually. Might be more of a payment gateway integration enhancement.

[nostahl]

is e-commerce refactoring going in with this as well?

[maxchock]

I wish the image carousel AKA product image slideshow can be display in the product page while uploading and NOT separate page to create it.

[nostahl]

would be nice to select if the thumbnails show on the side or bottom too

[krishnanhemanth]

Hi
Would like to see enhancements in After Sales
A product that is sold may come back to the manufacturing unit or to a service centre with the following conditions

1. service / repair / Replacement under warranty
2. service / repair - warranty expired / Paid Service
   the system should capture the following

a) Material Inward
b) Serial Number
c) info of the product based on serial number
d) Inspection of product and fault diagnosis
e) spares required - used for estimate of repair to be sent to the customer
f) Repair / Replacement Authorisation
g) Repair Details - Spares and Labour used
This should trigger stock deduction
h) generation of Invoice
i) if replaced then the document should show the previous serial number and the present serial number
j) After sales analysis -
Most part that is getting changed
model with frequent repairs
Repair frequency
cost to the company when serviced under warranty

There can be a few things that i might have missed
Thanks and regards
Hemanth

[harshit-30]

@krishnanhemanth

Would like to see enhancements in After Sales

@nostahl

would be nice to select if the thumbnails show on the side or bottom too

@maxchock

I wish the image carousel AKA product image slideshow can be display in the product page while uploading and NOT separate page to create it.

Please create an issue with detailed info on our Github repo for this to be considered in the upcoming roadmaps.

[harshit-30]

@nostahl

is e-commerce refactoring going in with this as well?

It has already been released in v13.11.0.

@njb

The Front End/E Commerce feature has come a long way, very impressed. I think the one glaring thing missing is multiple payment options for check out.

Thanks @njb, this is a valuable feature, please raise an issue over our Github Repo with detailed specs.

[njb]

Thanks for this. There is an open issue that addresses this Option to choose payment gateway in shopping cart · Issue #12787 · frappe/erpnext · GitHub From a requirements standpoint, I will add some additional thoughts to the existing discussion. Thanks.