Fiscal year - impact on performance

Install / Update Deployment
1

I can’t remember exactly where I saw/read or possibly imagined this, but I vaguely remember seeing a post on the impact of editing historical transactions in a different fiscal year to the current one.
If anyone has any input here - I am catching up some legacy data, and when I open/cancel/amend transactions that are old (like 2+ years) the system is much less responsive and gives more timeouts.

  • Does anyone know if changing the “active” fiscal year/period would alleviate this?
  • If so, do I need to work on a particular fiscal years’ transactions, then change to the next period before doing those ones, or is this of no real benefit?

Thanks

2

No, changing active FY will not speed up the transaction. Only solution to this problem is implementing immutable ledger, which is on the pipeline for future implementation.

2 Likes
3

Thank you