Hi Team,
I have recently configured the updated TDS categories for FY 2026 in ERPNext (using India Compliance). However, I’ve noticed a mismatch in how TDS sections/descriptions are presented in ERPNext compared to the Income Tax Portal.
Observation:
-
On the Income Tax Portal, TDS sections are described in a more detailed/legal format, for example:
- “Rent on machinery etc. - specified person - 393(1) [Table: Sl. No. 2(ii).D(a)] - 1008”
-
Whereas in ERPNext, the same appears in a simplified format like:
- “Rent on Plant / Machinery - Individual” (Section: 1008)
Concern:
-
Although the section code (e.g., 1008) matches, the naming convention and description differ significantly.
-
This creates confusion while mapping and validating TDS categories with statutory references.
Questions:
-
Is this difference in naming expected behavior in ERPNext / India Compliance?
-
Is ERPNext internally aligned only based on section codes, and not the full description from the Income Tax Portal?
-
Are we expected to manually align naming conventions for better clarity, or is there an upcoming update to standardize this?
-
Could this mismatch create any issues during:
-
TDS return filing
-
Validation with TRACES / Income Tax Portal
-
Additional Context:
-
TDS category configured with:
-
Section: 1008
-
Entity: Individual
-
Thresholds and rates as per FY 2026 updates
-
Would appreciate clarification on whether this is a configuration gap from my side or a known difference between ERPNext and statutory portal representations.
Thanks in advance!

