Hi all - what kind of performance improvements can one expect if erpnext is hosted locally or on a server closer to our users? I’m particularly interested in improving performance in form for the link fields which are rather slow since they have to validate the selection from another table. Any experience shared would be helpful.
–
Note:
If you are posting an issue,
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ERPNext Developer Forum" group.
FYI, we looked at the Item query again we found that in the search, there was an end_of_life condition that could considerably slow down the query and since it was already a validation, we removed the condition from search - I think it should help a lot more. We will push this a bit later - please let us know if there is an improvement in the Item search.
What we can also do is cache the Item table in the client-side - this will make loading a bit slower but once the table is loaded, the item selection could be much faster...
On 29-Jul-2013, at 6:17 AM, lxnow <la...@union.ph> wrote:
Hi all - what kind of performance improvements can one expect if erpnext is hosted locally or on a server closer to our users? I'm particularly interested in improving performance in form for the link fields which are rather slow since they have to validate the selection from another table. Any experience shared would be helpful.
–
Note:
If you are posting an issue,
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “ERPNext Developer Forum” group.
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ERPNext Developer Forum" group.
* Trial - You're right, of course, about doing a trial. Something to possibly do later on when I have more time.
* end_of_life condition - not sure what this means exactly but if / when you do remove this validation, please update here so we can compare
* local caching - love this idea. I would imagine that this would create a whole bunch of new possible issues for other users. Maybe a toggle in Setup for local caching for the entire system? Or by user (more work for this option I suppose)?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Rushabh Mehta <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Laurence,
best way is to do a trial.
FYI, we looked at the Item query again we found that in the search, there was an end_of_life condition that could considerably slow down the query and since it was already a validation, we removed the condition from search - I think it should help a lot more. We will push this a bit later - please let us know if there is an improvement in the Item search.
What we can also do is cache the Item table in the client-side - this will make loading a bit slower but once the table is loaded, the item selection could be much faster...
On 29-Jul-2013, at 6:17 AM, lxnow <la...@union.ph> wrote:
Hi all - what kind of performance improvements can one expect if erpnext is hosted locally or on a server closer to our users? I'm particularly interested in improving performance in form for the link fields which are rather slow since they have to validate the selection from another table. Any experience shared would be helpful.
–
Note:
If you are posting an issue,
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ERPNext Developer Forum" group.
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "ERPNext Developer Forum" group.
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ERPNext Developer Forum" group.
Refresh and try fetching items now. We have removed the end of life condition from the query. Let us know if it has made any improvements.
Thanks,
Anand.
On 29-Jul-2013, at 1:17 PM, Laurence Cua <la...@union.ph> wrote:
* Trial - You're right, of course, about doing a trial. Something to possibly do later on when I have more time.
* end_of_life condition - not sure what this means exactly but if / when you do remove this validation, please update here so we can compare
* local caching - love this idea. I would imagine that this would create a whole bunch of new possible issues for other users. Maybe a toggle in Setup for local caching for the entire system? Or by user (more work for this option I suppose)?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Rushabh Mehta <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Laurence,
best way is to do a trial.
FYI, we looked at the Item query again we found that in the search, there was an end_of_life condition that could considerably slow down the query and since it was already a validation, we removed the condition from search - I think it should help a lot more. We will push this a bit later - please let us know if there is an improvement in the Item search.
What we can also do is cache the Item table in the client-side - this will make loading a bit slower but once the table is loaded, the item selection could be much faster...
On 29-Jul-2013, at 6:17 AM, lxnow <la...@union.ph> wrote:
Hi all - what kind of performance improvements can one expect if erpnext is hosted locally or on a server closer to our users? I'm particularly interested in improving performance in form for the link fields which are rather slow since they have to validate the selection from another table. Any experience shared would be helpful.
–
Note:
If you are posting an issue,
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “ERPNext Developer Forum” group.
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups “ERPNext Developer Forum” group.
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “ERPNext Developer Forum” group.
We should be able to replicate it at our end. So please give us as much information as you can. Please see it from the point of view of the person receiving the communication.
For sending images, use http://imgur.com or other similar services. Do not send images as attachments. Links are good. Same goes for any file you are going to send.
End of Note
—
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ERPNext Developer Forum" group.